Unified Judicial System Hiring Policy auditors, paralegals, or interns). At the hearing, having already admitted to the four rules violations, respondent offered only mitigation to counter the ODC's disbarment recommendation. Id., at 165-66. The Hearing Committee rejected a disbarment sanction, finding it significant that respondent had not been previously disciplined by the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board, his fellow attorneys testified they were confident practicing with him, and respondent had "establish[ed] the existence of numerous psychiatric disorders which were causally connected to the misconduct at issue in this Commonwealth. Respondent was questioned by an investigator with the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics about the discrepancies between his New Jersey bar application and the record evidence of his career as a physician and medical disciplinary proceedings. facts or considerations. The Disciplinary Board recommended respondent's license be revoked so he would have to retake the bar exam and face the Board of Law Examiners again, this time subject to an authentic evaluation. Current Maximum Salary: $129,938 This position is professional legal work Appropriately document each file during the investigation (e.g. Ability to work without significant supervision. UJS hiring and employment policies and procedures are intended to conform to all applicable Thank you for your interest in employment with the Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Trooper, Harrisburg, or Pittsburgh office, remote work is available for many of the positions duties. See Renfroe, at 404 (accepting causal connection between misconduct during addiction but still mandating disbarment). WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel cannot represent you, give you any legal advice, or change the outcome of a court decision. all applicants are given a fair and equal opportunity to compete for all employment positions. On January 20, 2000, respondent's attorney referred him to Dr. Robert Sadoff, a forensic psychiatrist, for a psychological evaluation. Ability to express ideas effectively, appropriately, logically, and in an organized fashion, orally and in writing. No part of the information on this site may be reproduced for profit or sold for profit. 0 Prepare memoranda seeking the approval of Counsel-in-Charge to transfer files to trial counsel. Typical Duties: "[M]indful of the serious nature of [r]espondent's misconduct in [providing] false information on his bar application in numerous areas in a calculated attempt to conceal misconduct as a medical doctor and related disciplinary action . Respondent has admitted that for 18 years (from 1982-2000), he was incapable of telling the truth in official documents or at official proceedings when it was in his perceived personal interest not to do so. Contact your local county court for more information orvisit their website.You can also learn more about mitigating the spread of the virus atHealth.pa.gov. In his application to the law school, respondent failed to disclose he attended medical school, received medical licenses, lived in California, worked as a physician, had disciplinary proceedings in California and New York, and had both states' medical licenses revoked; respondent omitted all history related to his practice of medicine. System. The evaluation lasted about two hours, and following a second hour-long evaluation on May 19, 2000, Dr. Sadoff opined: Letter From Dr. Sadoff to Carl Poplar, Esq., 5/22/00, at 13. Appropriately document each file during the investigation (e.g. @/bL0D1r1. Location of Office of Disciplinary Counsel. See In re Iulo, 564 Pa. 205, 766 A.2d 335, 339 (2001). Conduct 1.7 requires attorneys to avoid conflicts of interest in the representation of multiple clients. Dr. Sadoff also testified and endorsed Dr. Kramer's findings and diagnosis, stating: "Clearly in my opinion within a reasonable medical certainty [respondent's mental infirmities coupled with his then-present emotional pressures] were a substantial factor and the reason why [respondent] answered [the questions on the bar application] the way he did." In light of the falsehoods and material omissions that riddled Respondent's application to sit for the bar examination, it is patently obvious that the Board of Law Examiners did not have a full and fair opportunity to determine whether he should have been admitted as an attorney in the first instance. The primary purpose of our lawyer discipline system in Pennsylvania is to protect the public, preserve the integrity of the courts, and deter unethical conduct. WebAre you a PA attorney interested in becoming a Hearing Committee Member with the Disciplinary Board? Ability to work effectively with supervisors and fellow employees. Ability to express ideas effectively, appropriately, logically, and in an organized fashion, orally and in writing. 39. He agreed to surrender his California medical license. auditors, paralegals, or interns). Fairness. investigates and prosecutes complaints of misconduct against Pennsylvania attorneys. (b)Disciplinary District Offices. and analysis, communication with complainants and respondent-attorneys, and legal writing. Review post-dismissal correspondence (including subsequent complaints) from complainants and conduct additional, investigation as necessary to recommend a course of action to Counsel-in-Charge. Rule 1.4. Respondent passed both bar examinations, and each state's character and fitness evaluation failed to reveal his falsifications; he was granted licenses to practice law in both states. . Richard Hernandez, Philadelphia, for Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Ensure, that all file documents are stored electronically. 4448; amended March 13, 1991, effective November 16, 1991, 21 Pa.B. Review docket entries, pleadings, and other documents relevant to assigned files. September 28, 2019, Pennsylvania Code (Rules and Regulations), Title 204 - JUDICIAL SYSTEM GENERAL PROVISIONS, Subpart C - DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, Chapter 93 - ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION, Subchapter D - OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 204 Pa. Code 93.63 - Powers and duties of Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Email the 2729; amended April 25, 1997, effective April 26, 1997, 27 Pa.B. 39. 53, No. WebThe Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts does not serve as a centralized hiring facility for all court offices within the Commonwealth. Ability to work effectively with supervisors and fellow employees. Possession of a certificate of admission to the Bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, or eligibility for such certification. The Pennsylvania Judiciary has provideddetailed updates regarding county-by-county court operations and proceedings.General information is also provided on ourFAQ page. N.T. On June 5, 2001, the Disciplinary Board appointed a three-member hearing committee to hear respondent's case. While attending law school, respondent submitted a resum to a law firm falsely representing he held medical licenses in California and New York. . including drafting correspondence and recommending whether to re-open a matter. Moreover, we recognize that the sentence imposed by the federal court has already provided Respondent with punishment for his misconduct. Respondent did not concede his working for Kennard Lab Associates was a lie, telling the investigator he worked there for 10 years as a lab director. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. Any previous Orders in this line shall expire according to their own terms. The Board commented: "The quantity and quality of [r]espondent's lies over such a long period of time is unlike anything witnessed by this Board in previous cases." September 28, 2019, Pennsylvania Bulletin, Vol 49, No. Justice NEWMAN files a concurring and dissenting opinion in which Justices CASTILLE and BAER join. Braun offered expert medical testimony that he suffered from neurotic depression at the time of the forgeries and sought to mitigate his sanction to suspension. 7348 (November 26, 2022). 404 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<08307DF2E913FC428ABE20778F4A0158>]/Index[389 30]/Info 388 0 R/Length 79/Prev 691399/Root 390 0 R/Size 419/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream Contact Us. .," as well as respondent's deceit with regard to his New Jersey bar application, the Hearing Committee recommended respondent's Pennsylvania license to practice law be suspended for five years followed by a two-year probationary period. Respect. of Pennsylvania. It is within the inherent and exclusive power of this Court to govern the conduct of attorneys. September 28, 2019, Pennsylvania Code (Rules and Regulations), Title 204 - JUDICIAL SYSTEM GENERAL PROVISIONS, Subpart C - DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 204 Pa. Code 85.5 - Location of Office of Disciplinary Counsel. To Apply: OGC Main Office Attorneys. Report of Hearing Committee 1.03, 6/10/03, at 21-22. including drafting correspondence and recommending whether to re-open a matter. 215(d), and respectfully represent that: I. an interview should request so in advance. In Braun, the respondent was brought before the Disciplinary Board for forging his client's signature on 15 checks and converting a total of $1,962.94 for his own use. Respondent lied to the Board of Law Examiners to bypass a proper evaluation of his character and fitness because he felt the truth might have barred him from sitting for the bar exam. an interview should request so in advance. 0 The Pennsylvania Supreme Courts amendment of Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1006, combined with the Pennsylvania Superior Courts reduction in the threshold for venue in Hangey v.Husqvarna Professional Products, Inc., 247 A.3d 1136 (Pa. Super. This Court followed the Board's recommendation that the established mental disorder and requisite causal connection to the misconduct, coupled with the underlying facts of Braun's case, justified suspension rather than disbarment. %PDF-1.6 % When considering employment with the Pennsylvania Courts, it is important to note that applicant screening and hiring is decentralized within the court system. Applicants who need accommodation for Your Privacy Choices.css-65lj3z{display:inline-block;vertical-align:middle;height:14px;margin-left:6px;}. I further agree with the reasoning of the Majority in support of this decision. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller, 506 A.2d 872 (Pa. 1986). Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Chung, 548 Pa. 108, 695 A.2d 405, 407 (1997). Here, this Court will not reward respondent with the presumption of reinstatement after five years since his admittance to the bar was predicated on fraudulent precepts in the first instance. Justice NEWMAN, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion. System. If you wish to seek employment as a Law Clerk for a Common Pleas judge, write directly to the judge of interest or contact the district court administrator. Possession of a certificate of admission to the Bar of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, or eligibility for such certification. I agree with the Majority that this Court should order the disbarment of Respondent. all applicants are given a fair and equal opportunity to compete for all employment positions. 7, February 18, 2023. Eventually, respondent conceded at the hearing he made the above misrepresentations because he had spent three years in law school and was afraid if he revealed his past and was denied permission to sit for the bar exam, he would lose those three years of his life. Box 62485, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17106, Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (376986) to (376987). However, I respectfully dissent from the portion of the Opinion that declines to follow the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board to revoke the license of Respondent to practice law. Instead, in determining the proper measure of discipline, which is not intended to be punitive in nature, we, In contrast, suspension is a withdrawal of the privilege for a defined period of time not to exceed five, Full title:OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner v. Akim Frederic CZMUS. Copyright 2008-2023, Glassdoor, Inc. "Glassdoor" and logo are registered trademarks of Glassdoor, Inc, Disciplinary Counsel, Central Intake - Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of PA. Get alerts to jobs like this, to your inbox. For The This stipulation was accepted by California's medical licensing board. state and federal laws governing fair and nondiscriminatory hiring and employment practices and are subject to change as necessary to The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Current through Register Vol. The Disciplinary Board WebThe General Counsel. Respondent's Pennsylvania bar application contained the following verification whereby he attested, under penalty of perjury, that his submission contained no omissions or falsehoods: Application for Admission to the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 4/9/95, at 5. 601 Commonwealth AvenueP.O. . Reasonable accommodations will be provided to applicants with disabilities as may be necessary to ensure that There are a number of disciplinary cases involving simple assaults. Dr. Kramer prescribed respondent a regiment of medications which he continues to take, including Paxil, Wellbutrin, Lithium, Zyprexa, and Ritalin. WebOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Baldwin - 657 Pa. 339, 225 A.3d 817 (2020) Rule: Pa. R. Prof. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States. Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. At the time of respondent's proceedings, these rules were as follows: Rule 8.1 Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters. WebDisciplinary Counsel conducts a preliminary review or inquiry. Bulletin, Vol 49, No. 2037; amended February 21, 2003, effective February 22, 2003, 33 Pa.B. affiliation, race, color, age, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, disability, or other non-merit telephone notes, emails, or other documentation). The committee has now authorized Jessica Yates, the attorney regulation counsel, to file a formal complaint against Ellis with the presiding disciplinary judge, according to Yates. While based in ODCs See Renfroe, at 403-04 ("The power of a court to disbar an attorney should be exercised with great caution, but there should be no hesitation in exercising it when it clearly appears that it is demanded for the protection of the public.") Below is a comparison between our most recent version and the prior quarterly release. Skill in analyzing and drafting legal documents, legal instruments, and other work product. Candidates interested in applying for this position are requested to submit a written resume and cover letter in .PDF format Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, 3/8/04, at 18. Conduct 1.1 and 1.7, relating to competence and conflicts of interest, because she had inadequate information for a conflict of interest analysis and there was significant risk that representation of any individual client would materially limit her ability to represent the others. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and his top aide, Brent Webster, were both sued in May 2022. Chief Justice CAPPY and Justices NIGRO and SAYLOR join the opinion. The following year, the New York medical licensing board initiated a reciprocal disciplinary proceeding. Description: That said, respondent's sins were not such as involved knowledge or legal abilities they were sins of character and truthfulness. The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania recruits, employs, and promotes the most qualified applicants without regard to their political Review docket entries, pleadings, and other documents relevant to assigned files. 21. WebOffice of Disciplinary Counsel 201 Merchant Street, Suite 1600 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Phone: (808) 521-4591 For access to Traffic cases; District Court, Circuit Court, and Family Court criminal; District Court, Circuit Court civil, and Family Court civil; Land Court and Tax Appeal Court; and appellate court case information. Conduct 1.7 requires attorneys to avoid conflicts of interest in the representation of multiple clients. For the reasons discussed below, we hold respondent's misconduct and continuous pattern of deceit and dishonesty warrants disbarment. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Pozonsky, Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cappuccio, California Business and Professions Code 2261. Knowledge of principles, methods, materials, and practices of legal research. By order dated December 4, 2001, the New Jersey Supreme Court found respondent had violated two rules of professional conduct and revoked his license to practice law; he was barred from seeking readmission for two years. Candidates interested in applying for this position are requested to submit a written resume and cover letter in .PDF format . 5156; amended May 22, 2015, effective immediately, 45 Pa.B. Pennsylvania Josh Shapiro, Governor Jennifer Selber, General Counsel. Petitioner, whose principal Braun, at 895-96. In October, 1986, the California Attorney General commenced a disciplinary action against respondent as a result of the false certificates submitted to the two Glendale hospitals. Communicate with, and obtain relevant documentation from, third parties regarding allegations of misconduct. remain in compliance with such laws. By order of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the general statewide judicial emergency declared and maintained in previous Court Orders of March 16, March 18, March 24, April 1 and April 28 ceased as of June 1, 2020. facts or considerations. detailed updates regarding county-by-county court operations and proceedings. About eight months later, respondent amended his answer, correcting some of the falsehoods but still fabricating some of his history. Web1. ("Respondent has been a fraudulent member of this bar since the very beginning of the process. Current Maximum Salary: $129,938 No part of the information on this site may be reproduced forprofit or sold for profit. discussing presumption of reinstatement that follows five-year suspension and contrasting it with disbarment. WebThe location of the headquarters of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel is: Office of Disciplinary Counsel. affiliation, race, color, age, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, religion, disability, or other non-merit Accordingly, while I agree with the Majority to disbar Respondent, I dissent from the portion of its Opinion that rejects the recommendation of the Disciplinary Board to revoke the license of Respondent. Commonwealth v. Stern, 549 Pa. 505, 701 A.2d 568 (1997); Wajert v. State Ethics Comm'n, 491 Pa. 255, 420 A.2d 439 (1980). At the end of the conference, respondent sought and was granted a continuance to May 8, 2002 for his full hearing. Conduct 1.1 and 1.7 because she jointly represented individual clients and Penn State, and the respondent did not exhibit any understanding of the magnitude of the challenge that she was facing. PARTIES TO DISCIPLINE ON CONSENT 1. (CNN) -- The disciplinary office that regulates attorney conduct in Colorado is taking steps toward potentially bringing an ethics complaint against Jenna Ellis, the lawyer who played a prominent role in former President Donald Trump's attempts to As directed, take additional action, Communicate with respondents to obtain information or documentation relevant to an investigation or to resolve matters. As this sanction was not sought by Office of Disciplinary Counsel, we decline to impose it at this juncture. Accordingly, respondent is disbarred from practicing law in the courts of Pennsylvania; respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. Because discipline is imposed on a case-by-case basis, we must consider the totality of Hearing, 5/8/02, at 146. (position available January 2023), $48,334.06 per year + benefits ($1,000.00 less until Pennsylvania Bar Exam is passed). By way of mitigation, respondent offered the following explanation: "At the time, [he] was suffering under a severe disability resulting from an organic brain dysfunction caused by encephalitis, severe panic attacks and an undiagnosed Bipolar Disorder which medical condition was a causal factor in his actions." See comment to amended Pa.R.P.C. WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) is the branch of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that investigates and prosecutes complaints of misconduct against Pennsylvania attorneys. Knowledge of Disciplinary Board policies and procedures. There is no fee for this service. Unified Judicial System Hiring Policy See Pa.R.D.E. This position is professional legal work Prepare dismissal letters, letters of concern or education, and other correspondence. In Czmus, our Court disbarred an attorney who willfully concealed the fact that he had previously worked as a physician and committed acts of serious malpractice which led to his medical license revocation, as well as falsified his work history on his applications to the bar of both Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Dr. Sadoff reviewed the results of the tests and the opinion of Dr. Kramer and ultimately agreed with Dr. Kramer's diagnosis. Description: The provisions of this 85.5 amended through August 30, 1985, effective August 31, 1985, 15 Pa.B. (Word, video or audio submissions will not be accepted) noting position title to: Disciplinary Board Executive Offices WebPennsylvania Rule of Disciplinary Enforcement ("Pa.R.D.E.") "Despite the mitigation evidence presented, [r]espondent's actions are too egregious to permit a recommendation of less than disbarment." Minimum Qualifications: Conduct initial preliminary review of disciplinary complaints to recommend whether to dismiss the complaint or refer the. State regulations are updated quarterly; we currently have two versions available. 204 Pa. Code 85.5. We communicate regularly with the Governors Office and the state Department of Health for guidance on measures to continue protecting the health and safety of court users and court employees. See Pa.R.D.E. state and federal laws governing fair and nondiscriminatory hiring and employment practices and are subject to change as necessary to Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. hb```c``z o @1VX_tYs0ia0,,MM;xiL(b^Ih/>t*gf/<1G0v-O'z'~?6-s[7L^aPI!C7QyGwx*YP0(:'(X Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. 5552. Dr. Sadoff also testified that if respondent continued his therapy sessions and medications, he believed respondent's mental infirmities would not inhibit his future ability to practice law or conform to ethical conduct. Each of the appellate courts and each of the local or county courts acts separately to hire those individuals needed to maintain their respective operations. May 23, 2015, Pennsylvania . The board further alleged respondent knowingly made false documents and altered surgical treatment records to hide his inept treatment of the patients. In 1984, respondent was granted a license to practice medicine and surgery in California, and he moved there in April, 1985. Petitioner sought to impose discipline on the respondent for violating Pa. R. Prof. Before CAPPY, C.J., and CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, SAYLOR, EAKIN and BAER, JJ. ." matter to trial counsel. The He also surrendered his New York medical license. WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel shall have the power and duty (pursuant to Enforcement Rule 207(b)): (1) To investigate all matters involving alleged misconduct (a) A lawyer is subject to discipline if the lawyer has made a materially false statement in, or if the lawyer has deliberately failed to disclose a material fact requested The Board of Law Examiners is an essential gatekeeper that screens applicants seeking admission to the bar, and if respondent were sanctioned only with a suspension, it would accomplish an end-run around this essential inquiry. (1/4) 27 Feb 2023 13:35:28 Knowledge of state and federal laws, particularly in regard to disciplinary administration. Further, the Disciplinary Board noted that respondent subverted the truth-determining process of the Board of Law Examiners while applying to sit for the bar exam and obtained his law license under false pretenses. Webthe integrity of the legal system. Respondent represented Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) and three of its administrators during grand jury proceedings investigating matters relating to child abuse accusations against a former assistant football coach. Appeal from the Pennsylvania Office of Disciplinary Counsel. While respondent was on probation and contesting New York's reciprocal discipline, the California medical board lodged new accusations against him, charging that during his license probationary period, respondent engaged in grossly negligent or incompetent treatment of six patients, one of whom lost most of his eyesight. The New Jersey disciplinary hearing was held June 26, 2000, and Drs. While Braun ultimately replaced the funds, the ODC instituted disciplinary proceedings and recommended disbarment. This position is professional legal work Id. Justices CASTILLE and BAER join this concurring and dissenting opinion. This Court has synthesized the distinction between disbarment and suspension as: In the Matter of Renfroe, 548 Pa. 101, 695 A.2d 401, 403 (1997) (quotation omitted). . [As amended by order entered December 6, 1994, effective January 1, 1995.] A grievance against an attorney must be submitted in writing, unless prior approval is received in special circumstances. guW+@P'30@'3!|VM0zHq30~3j Each year, the Board appoints volunteer HCMs who review recommendations offered by Office of Disciplinary Counsel, conduct hearings, and prepare a report and recommendation. Conduct 1.7 requires attorneys to avoid conflicts of interest in the representation of 144 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<37A067510F2C714B8CD11C573E85301D><965855B8AD0A6643B46446FDF9524C0D>]/Index[115 50]/Info 114 0 R/Length 131/Prev 212760/Root 116 0 R/Size 165/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream From 1970 to 1977, respondent attended Brown University and earned a medical degree. 5325; amended September 11, 1992, effective September 12, 1992, 22 Pa.B. Reasonable accommodations will be provided to applicants with disabilities as may be necessary to ensure that In his answer, respondent admitted making the serial falsehoods and "that at the time such statements were made he knew that each such statement was false." The location of the headquarters of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel is: Office of Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Judicial Center 601 Commonwealth Avenue, Suite 2700 P. O. and analysis, communication with complainants and respondent-attorneys, and legal writing. In November, 1999, respondent began seeing Dr. Gary Kramer, a licensed psychiatrist, who diagnosed respondent as suffering from multiple psychiatric disorders bipolar disorder, panic disorder, obsessive compulsive personality disorder, and depression. Knowledge of and skillful ability in Microsoft Office Suite and other basic or proprietary computer applications. endstream endobj startxref 4624; amended July 11, 1993, effective immediately, 23 Pa.B. ." 3080; amended October 13, 1989, effective October 14, 1989, 19 Pa.B. These qualities may be examined as part of any request for reinstatement, and there appears little to be gained in making him sit for a test on non-character matters. WebThe phone number and address are (406) 449-6577, P.O. 217, and shall pay the costs of these proceedings pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. UJS hiring and employment policies and procedures are intended to conform to all applicable WebDescription: The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) is the branch of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that investigates and prosecutes complaints of misconduct against Pennsylvania attorneys. Where the complaint does not provide a basis to open a formal investigation or where Disciplinary Counsel does not have jurisdiction, the complaint is treated statistically as an undocketed matter. Our review in disciplinary cases is de novo; while we give substantial deference to the findings of the Hearing Committee or the Disciplinary Board, we are not bound by them. Knowledge of Disciplinary Board policies and procedures. telephone notes, emails, or other documentation). WebThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel may obtain the client files of an attorney who has abandoned his or her practice. endstream endobj 116 0 obj <. 6654; amended August 11, 2012, effective immediately, 42 Pa.B. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. In 1995, respondent submitted applications to sit for the Pennsylvania and New Jersey bar examinations. endstream endobj startxref The Disciplinary Board rejected the recommendation of the Hearing Committee and held: "The Board's review of the record persuades us that this case requires disbarment."